If you shop US stores from abroad, you may have heard the hopeful headline from May: a federal trade court had struck down the Trump administration’s sweeping 10% tariff on almost everything entering the United States. Prices, the thinking went, might ease. That hope was short-lived. On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stepped in and stayed the lower court’s ruling, letting the government keep collecting the tariff while the legal battle plays out on appeal.<\/p>\n
Here is what actually happened, why it keeps mattering to international shoppers, and what you can do about it.<\/p>\n
In early May, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the administration’s use of Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a flat 10% duty on virtually all imported goods was unlawful. The court found that the legal trigger for Section 122 \u2014 a “large and serious US balance-of-payments deficit” \u2014 had not actually been met. It ordered the government to stop collecting the duties and to refund what had already been paid, with interest. Estimates put the total collected in just 72 days at roughly $25 billion.<\/p>\n
The Federal Circuit’s June 11 stay reverses that freeze. The appeals court concluded that the government showed a sufficient likelihood of success on appeal and that the lower court’s reading of the statute may be too narrow. Until the case is fully decided \u2014 a process that could take months or longer \u2014 the 10% tariff stays on the books and continues to apply to nearly all goods entering the United States, regardless of origin or category.<\/p>\n
The Section 122 tariff is assessed on the importer of record \u2014 typically the brand or retailer, not the end consumer. But costs like these rarely stay with the importer. When a major US retailer pays 10% more to bring a product in from overseas, that cost gets spread somewhere: into the retail price, into reduced margins, or into a mix of both. The degree of pass-through varies by category and brand, but the net effect is that US retail prices on many goods \u2014 particularly consumer electronics, clothing, footwear, sporting goods, and home furnishings, categories heavily sourced from Asia \u2014 have been running higher in 2026 than they would have been without the tariff.<\/p>\n
For international shoppers who use a US address to access American retail, this is not great news on the surface. But it needs to be kept in perspective.<\/p>\n
Even with tariff-adjusted pricing baked in, US retail benchmarks remain well below what the same goods cost in many international markets. A brand-name smartphone, a pair of branded sneakers, a kitchen appliance, or a premium supplement will typically run 20 to 50 percent less in the US than at equivalent points of sale in the Gulf, Mexico, Latin America, or Southeast Asia, once local duties, import markups, and retailer margins are factored in for those destinations. The tariff has narrowed the gap slightly, but it has not closed it.<\/p>\n
For small resellers and boutique importers \u2014 a significant share of the Viabox community \u2014 the math still works. US sourcing, particularly on fashion, electronics, and beauty, continues to offer meaningful margins even after absorbing both US tariff effects on the front end and destination-country import duties on the back end.<\/p>\n
Not every category is affected equally. US-made goods \u2014 certain agricultural products, domestically produced hardware, and some specialty goods \u2014 are largely shielded from the Section 122 pass-through effect because the tariff does not raise their input cost. Categories to watch more carefully include:<\/p>\n
US-produced items like nutritional supplements made domestically, certain beauty brands that manufacture in the US, and local artisan goods are likely to see less price impact.<\/p>\n
The most practical response is to shop smarter, not less. A few strategies that hold up well in the current environment:<\/p>\n
Tariff litigation in the US is moving quickly and unpredictably. A ruling that seemed to clear the way for refunds was reversed within five weeks. Businesses and individual shoppers relying on a specific trade-policy outcome are exposed to that volatility. The more durable strategy is to build your shopping workflow around structural advantages that do not depend on any single court ruling: the breadth of US retail, the scale of competition that keeps American prices low, and the logistics infrastructure to get those purchases to you efficiently and cost-effectively wherever you are.<\/p>\n
If you buy regularly from US stores and ship internationally, now is a good time to review how you are consolidating purchases. A well-timed combined shipment through a US forwarding address can offset a meaningful portion of any price movement at the retailer level \u2014 and that math does not change regardless of how the Section 122 appeal ends.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n